Delhi High Court Seeks Salman Khan’s Response on Plea by Producer of Kala Hiran

The Delhi High Court has called for actor Salman Khan’s response regarding a plea filed by the producer of the film Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy, which seeks to halt proceedings on Khan’s lawsuit against the movie’s proposed release. This request was made during a hearing on October 6, 2026, by Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, who issued a notice to Khan regarding the matter.

Background

The ongoing legal dispute centers around Khan’s assertion that Kala Hiran is based on his life. The producer, Amit Jani, argues that the issues presented in this recent plea overlap with earlier litigation initiated by Khan concerning the film. In this context, the producer has claimed that the continuation of litigation is unnecessary given the previous case already filed in the High Court.

Details of the Case

In his lawsuit, Salman Khan seeks to prevent the release of Kala Hiran, emphasizing that the film infringes upon his personality and publicity rights. In response, producer Amit Jani contended that the ongoing proceedings represent a form of parallel litigation concerning the same film and related promotional materials. He maintains that Khan’s attempts to restrain the film’s release amount to an overlap with his earlier claims.

Previously, on December 11, 2025, the High Court provided Khan with an interim order aimed at protecting his personality rights. Following that, Khan filed for an additional interim order to halt the film’s release, which is still under consideration by the court.

Key Developments

The dispute over Kala Hiran has prominently featured in the headlines this year, following Khan’s objections to the film’s promotional material. A significant ruling came on July 27 when a coordinating bench of the High Court mandated the removal of a teaser and other promotional content from various online platforms.

At the time of the latest proceedings, filmmakers informed the court that they were not ready to release Kala Hiran, citing that the film had not received certification from the censor board and the trailer had not been made public. Meanwhile, the High Court’s interim ruling specifically prohibited the film’s creators from utilizing Khan’s name, mannerisms, or any of his distinctive traits for commercial purposes without obtaining his authorization, as well as prohibiting any dissemination of content potentially damaging to his reputation.

Context of the Dispute

The filmmakers have firmly maintained that Kala Hiran is not a biopic of Salman Khan. They argue that Khan cannot invoke his personality rights as a means to eliminate public discourse surrounding events related to the blackbuck poaching case, which has become a pivotal aspect of his public persona over the years.

Statements and Reactions

As the legal battle unfolds, there remains significant interest from both the public and media regarding the implications this case may have on creative expression in cinema, particularly concerning the depiction of real-life individuals. The responses from both Khan’s legal team and the filmmakers continue to shed light on how the intersection of personality rights and artistic representation will evolve in this dispute.

What Happens Next?

With the High Court awaiting Khan’s response to the producer’s plea, further developments are anticipated. Given the previous rulings and the film’s pending release status, the outcome of this case may establish important precedents regarding personality rights in the Indian film industry.

Conclusion

The ongoing saga of Salman Khan versus the producers of Kala Hiran reflects broader tensions in the entertainment industry over intellectual property and personality rights. As both parties prepare for the next steps in this legal confrontation, the implications of their dispute could resonate far beyond the courtroom, marking significant territory in the balance between artistic freedom and the rights of individuals depicted in film.