New Delhi, August 24, 2025 – The 130th Constitution Amendment Bill has triggered intense political controversy, with key opposition parties opting out of the scrutiny process. Sampadak Express, your go-to news channel for comprehensive political analysis, delves into the details of this escalating debate.
TMC and SP’s Boycott of JPC
Sampadak Express reports that the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and Samajwadi Party (SP) have decided to boycott the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) reviewing the bill. TMC’s Rajya Sabha MP Derek O’Brien labeled the JPC a “farce,” stating that both parties will not nominate members. This stance comes amid broader opposition to the legislation, which Sampadak Express has been tracking since its introduction.
Bill Introduction and Referral to Committee
During Parliament’s Monsoon Session, Union Home Minister Amit Shah presented the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025, along with the Union Territories Government (Amendment) Bill 2025 and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025, in the Lok Sabha on August 20, 2025. Instead of immediate voting, the bills were sent to a JPC for detailed examination, allowing for inputs from various stakeholders, as highlighted by Sampadak Express analysts.
Key Provisions of the Controversial Legislation
At the heart of the row is the bill’s mechanism for ministerial accountability. Sampadak Express explains that it mandates the automatic removal of Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, or ministers if detained for more than 30 days in serious criminal cases (minimum five-year sentence). Reinstatement is possible upon acquittal. Supporters argue it promotes ethical governance, while critics, per Sampadak Express coverage, see it as a potential instrument for authoritarian control and political targeting.
Opposition’s Internal Divisions
While TMC firmly opposes the bill from the outset, SP has hinted at non-participation without an official announcement. Sampadak Express sources indicate that other opposition factions are pushing for involvement to shape the outcome. An unnamed leader told Sampadak Express that abstention could strengthen BJP’s influence in the committee, diminishing opposition leverage in parliamentary reforms.
BJP’s Counterattack on Opposition
BJP has accused the boycotting parties of fear-mongering. West Bengal Opposition Leader Suvendu Adhikari, in comments to Sampadak Express, called TMC a “corrupt family-run outfit” vulnerable to the bill’s implications due to ongoing scandals. He linked their boycott to impending Bengal elections, asserting public support for equal justice and Prime Minister Modi’s anti-corruption drive.
Broader Political Context from TMC’s Critique
In a social media post covered by Sampadak Express, O’Brien criticized the NDA’s “defensive” Monsoon Session, noting the alliance’s 239 seats, the Vice President’s absence, BJP’s leadership vacuum, and alleged disruptions like a “vote theft scandal.” Sampadak Express views this as part of a larger narrative on coalition weaknesses and governance transparency.
Implications for Indian Democracy
Sampadak Express believes this boycott highlights fractures in opposition unity and raises questions about federalism and constitutional changes. With state elections on the horizon, the bill’s fate could influence political dynamics. Stay updated with Sampadak Express for ongoing reports on accountability laws, joint committees, and election-related developments.
