Delhi HC Orders AR Rahman, ‘Ponniyin Selvan 2’ Makers to Deposit Rs 2 Crore in Copyright Dispute

Date:

By The Sampadak Express

The Delhi High Court has directed acclaimed composer A.R. Rahman and the producers of the film Ponniyin Selvan 2 to deposit Rs 2 crore in connection with a copyright infringement case over the use of a classical composition, ‘Shiv Stuti’, by the Junior Dagar Brothers.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh, in an interim order dated April 25, observed that Rahman’s song Veera Raja Veera from the film bears striking resemblance to the original ‘Shiv Stuti’—noting that it is “not just inspired but is, in fact, identical” in terms of musical notes, emotional depth, and overall impact.

The court ruled that the underlying musical work in Veera Raja Veera is the same as the original composition by the late Ustad N. Faiyazuddin Dagar and Ustad Zahiruddin Dagar. It ordered the insertion of a credit slide across all OTT and online platforms acknowledging the Junior Dagar Brothers for their original work.

The lawsuit was filed by Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar, son of Faiyazuddin Dagar, who claimed ownership of the copyright to the original compositions, including ‘Shiv Stuti’. He argued that the defendants—A.R. Rahman, Madras Talkies, and Lyca Productions—had used the composition without authorization.

The court noted that some of the singers of Veera Raja Veera were in fact disciples of the plaintiff, further reinforcing the connection between the two compositions.”

The defendant’s composition infringes the complainant’s rights,” the court concluded, adding that the inclusion of other musical elements did not change the fact that the core composition remained the same. It also awarded Rs 2 lakh in legal costs to the plaintiff.

The Rs 2 crore to be deposited by the defendants will be held in a fixed deposit pending the final outcome of the case.

Rahman’s counsel argued that ‘Shiv Stuti’ is based on the traditional dhrupad genre, which lies in the public domain, and therefore cannot be copyrighted. However, the court found that a prima facie case of copyright infringement was made, and that failure to pass an interim order could cause “irreparable injury” to the legacy and rights of the original composers.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Kolkata Gang-Rape Was ‘Planned for Days’, Say Police; Prime Accused Targeted Victim Since Admission

The gang-rape of a 24-year-old law student in Kolkata was a pre-planned act, police revealed, with the prime accused, Monojit Mishra, allegedly targeting the victim from her first day in college. Along with two others, Mishra had a history of sexually harassing female students and recording the acts to blackmail them. The assault took place inside the college premises on June 25 and was reportedly triggered after the victim rejected Mishra's proposal.

Former India captain MS Dhoni Secures Trademark Rights to ‘Captain Cool’ Title

MS Dhoni has officially secured the trademark rights to the title ‘Captain Cool’ after a two-year legal battle. The court ruled in his favor, recognizing the phrase as uniquely associated with Dhoni’s persona. The trademark covers sports training and coaching services, hinting at a possible revival of his cricket academy plans.

Woman Injured in Acid Attack by Friend in Jabalpur; Accused Arrested, Parents Absconding

A 21-year-old woman, Shraddha Das, suffered severe burn injuries in an acid attack allegedly carried out by her former friend, Ishita Sahu, in Jabalpur’s Awadhpuri Colony. The incident occurred late Sunday night after Ishita lured Shraddha outside her home under the pretext of a surprise. Police have arrested Ishita, while her parents are absconding. The motive is suspected to be jealousy and personal resentment.

BJP slams Tejashwi Yadav’s vow to toss Waqf Act into the ‘dustbin’ calling it ‘Namazvad, not Samajwad’

The BJP on Monday strongly criticised RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav for his remarks against the amended Waqf Act, accusing the INDIA bloc of hiding religious appeasement behind a facade of socialism. BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi alleged that the opposition wants to turn the Constitution into a “Sharia script” and claimed their rallying cry of “Save the Constitution” is a cover for pushing “namazwaad”. He also defended the Election Commission’s voter roll revision in Bihar, calling the opposition’s objections a “defeatist mindset” ahead of the upcoming assembly polls.