In a landmark decision on Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that journalists cannot be subjected to criminal charges solely for expressing critical views about the government. The court highlighted the crucial role of press freedom in a democracy, asserting that mere criticism of the government does not justify legal action.
“Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of democratic nations, and the rights of journalists are protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution,” stated the bench, which included Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti.
This ruling stemmed from an FIR filed against journalist Abhishek Upadhyay in Uttar Pradesh, who was accused of publishing a report related to “caste dynamics within the general administration” of the state. The Supreme Court emphasized that “no coercive measures should be taken against the petitioner in connection with the article in question.”
Furthermore, the court has requested a response from the Uttar Pradesh government regarding Upadhyay’s plea to have the FIR dismissed. This decision reinforces the principle that journalistic work, even when critical of the government, deserves protection from unwarranted legal action.
The ruling is viewed as a strong affirmation of press freedom and serves as a warning against using criminal charges to suppress dissent.
